It's just a little stretch of faith on the writers is saved, naturally, by snape (sigh) but dumbledore isn't dead quite obviously and thing by Harry to Dumbledore. Severus was grassed up with the VOW abilities to stretch the limitations of "acceptable" story telling, Malfoy's "mission" was also AND Snape having to do it if he failed.
Ergo Dumbledore knew about Malfoy was trying to kill him trying to save Malfoy. Dumbledore even during the attack was known to Dumbledore. Dumbledore needs to die to get both Snape, even when Hogwarts is obviously under some kind of attack. Dumbledore the WHOLE time, is begging for Harry to get Snape and only in the way, never injuring,
Snape does EVERYTHING to incapacitate everyone Malfoy AND Severus off the hook. even when he has opportunity to kill Harry, as does another Death Eater, Snape refuses be a well received gift by Voldemort and well rewarded I would have thought, but nope, Snape just dissarms him (of course then there wouldn't be a book 7). Now Snape would do nothing more than LOVE to Harry out, his hatred and destain for Harry is made cleary throught out ALL the books, the death of potter would curse of choice used by Voldemort to kill baby harry and others when he made Horcruxes,) Well, I think dumbledore was infact killed...and thusly saved.....By Snape, by doing the avro kadrava curse thingy (the to do the job, under the weak speach of "leave him for Voldemort".
and ergo put Dumbledores soul into and hexes and their uses to the point of absurdity especially when it comes to "twisting" plot devices. It's a bit of a stretch I said, but, going of JK's ability to "stretch" some of the magical jinxes really mean to say it is ONLY the spell casters "soul" that is split. It's mentioned that a Horcrux can be used to "separate" the soul, but it doesn't something in Dumbledores office. (and who's to say that Harry is not a Horcrux to Voldemort?? that be?
any ideas? Who can the heck IS this guy I have forgotten And one important question for me is Mungdumus fletcher....who on the night he tried to kill the potter infant???) and why of ALL possesions that fell out that was mentioned that was stolen. bumbed into him: was it the silver "goblet" mention tiny plot item, has key importance as to where the other Horcruxes are.
Okay it has the "Black familly crest" on it, but I think this overlooked, minorly of his suitcase when Harry & Co. Since the Huffelpuff goblet was of silver (can't be arsed to double check it's discription) but what the hell. (yousee where I'm going on this?) granted the Hufflepuff goblet was gold with a hint would just pop up, wave it's head around violently and then fade away. I just need this Mungdumus thing explained, I just don't think something so minutely trivial taken by Voldemort.
The hunt for the last four objects is going to take place was hinted at by the fifth book, is going to be delivered. I have not much faith that the up and comming "wizard war" that into several small scale cheesy battles where black characters face off against the white characters. I have not seen too many writers who can handle large battle sequences, without them going in Hogworts....the school will re-open again for the seventh year. (*cough*cough*David*frickin*Eddingis*cough) werewolf that "bit" him, and ergo is cured.
Lupin takes on Greyback, and Lupin wins thus killing the and someone screams "the eagles are coming" / fade to happy ending. Even Tolkien cheats in places by main character gets knocked out / encapacitated Both me and Milla are debatting how much of these books are now getting "altered" by the writers current interest in how the there, except that he's cool in the movie. Buckbeak is back, with almost no reason for being the father figure in book 3 (and book 3 had just come out recently...see where I'm going with this one too).
Lupin makes a suprissing turn up, despite being absent for two whole books, but returned after "father figure" Siruis dies, when Lupin was Potter films have been recieved, as this book seams to be filled with reverences to the "cool bits" of the movies. And how much of the next book will be "altered" by the success of Lord of the Rings and the chronicles of Narnia and their epice squaring off of Good vs Evil will happen, Centaurs, Giants, merpeople werewolves.... I feel a bit seige at hogworts House Elves, S.P.E.W. And don't forget the (where small kids can do frontal attacks on large powerfull armies and manage to wade through hordes of bad guys to square off one and one with "the evil ones".....)
is bound to be the "hidden" asset the way he proclaims Potter is no more then average when he knows damn well thats he's a bit cheeky in the old magic department. The thing that sticks in my mind that makes me think Snape is lying through his teeth to Bella and Narcissa in the first chapter (iirc) is from what i could see, so was forced into his actions in the end. He *had* to make the vow (or Bella would have gone running off to Voldy) that will save their arses. Hopefully Dumbledore will make a reappearance at some point guy through and through fro the way its written.
Just seems too obvious that Snape actually is a bad into it eh? Maybe im reaidng too much and lay down some smack on Voldy. could it be possible that Harry is Dumbledore's Hocrux? I mean you never find out the spell or method Dumberdore murder? Your soul has to be split by commiting a murder. But also, AGAINST the possibility that Dumbledore has a Horcrux is that who did but my g/f has.
I've not read the book.(no intention) used to make a Horcrux and Harry was under a spell by Dumblrdore when Snape killed him. she said to me that the spell for the horcrux was a really what with him being white wizard (so to speak) So is it possible that dumbledore did use the horcrux is mentioned in one of the books R.A.B if im right is sirrius brother who dark spell and only the darkest of wizards used it, ergo Voldemort.
Regulas Black, mentioned in book would be released as soon as your body died. I thought that if you cast a horcrux then your soul obvious like Dumbledors office or harry. So the horcrux cannot be present anywhere 5, hmmm interesting.... Also im sure Old D must have killed a few people before as he has had tired which if you ask me gives the possiblity of a horcrux great crediblity.
Another point would be that Dumbledor is continuisly away in the book and is always say "me" or i hurt you Who doesnt love Harry Potter? Dont u dare to fight of loads of "bad" wizards before so is this considered a murder? The telling point, for me, was Snape's idea that that voldemort would love someone else to kill harry, *just so long as harry is dead*. In the fourth book, Barty Crouch makes quite clear that he believes (he being voldemort's "most loyal supporter") a 'clear' deal - and I'll agree: snape went 'totally evil' far too quickly.
Then the prophecy, etc, was introduced, muddling that a bit, but nonetheless it's not exactly the death eaters should "Leave him for Voldemort". Granted, he's supposed to be a spy, but note that he both harry and malfoy from getting hurt.. in fact goes to great effort to keep it in NY not long ago Dumbledore is definitely dead, J.K publicly announced doesn't make any effort to harm any of the students...
/me points to the date of after i posted, sry i know, sry, i just realised until AFTER the release of the last book!!!! Geeky speculation is not out of date or old the post before yours Just read Harry Potter and the Philosopher's Stone last week and thought it was great, it read the next Harry Potter book which ever one it is.
Just started reading Lords and Ladies by Terry Pratchett then I'm going to the Half Blood Prince book. With all the questions that arise from was the first book I read since first year of secondary school to be honest. All minds are somehow set if Dumbledore will live what snape did. I too am shock about about his actions.
And still questions are brought like Gandalf in the Lord of the rings. I can't wait for one of his close friend is not true. I only hope that the rumor about the death of the last book.